(I found the original maps what they used for the trailer) To me, this leaked version is the version of the e3 2001 trailer! In 2011 we got a version with stupid / non working parts. I am looking forward what the community will do with this leaked version.īecause this version was promised to us in 2001 at E3. Even M$ has released the old MsDOS as FOSS.Ībout the copyrighted stuff, at this moment i don't care. where such theft can mean a great loss for the company. Another thing would be in a current game, recently released. I also don't think that the author company has a significant loss of profits with this, they have already gained a lot with the sale of DN in their time. The only one who can be held legally responsible by the author company is the hacker, no one else.īesides, I don't think there will be many consequences of this in such an old game from more than 20 years ago, whose code is already of little use in current games and OS There may already be thousands who have downloaded these files. How do you want to link this to a copyright infringement, whose criminal responsibility depends on the hacker who stole them and uploaded them to the network? This files are now online and disposable in several webs, With this the question arises, if a person, who does not have to know that these codes are illegal, downloads them and uses them, or part of them, incorporating them into his own project. I agree with this, my thoughts are not going about this haccker who steal the code, certainly a copyright violation as generally piracy is. I feel like you're deliberately trying to water this issue down, in a pretty ridiculous manner, and I'm glad that I'm not invested enough in this issue, to get upset over it. It's a hacker breaking into a server, and distributing files which were never officially released in the first place, and you then aiding him. I don't understand why you're still going on about copyright. It is also necessary to differentiate between a download for private use, practically always legitimate, or for commercial use, very different and where copyright becomes relevant.Īlthough there are also nuances there that are sometimes somewhat absurd, such as the Eiffel Tower, without problems to photograph it during the day, but with lighting at night it is illegal to take a photo, because the lighting is copyrighted, it can be considered this problems when posting a photo of the Eiffel Tower at night. The responsibility of the Forum in this case can only be limited to checking the security, not any rights that the games on the list may have. Nor should anything happen if someone puts a link to a page, for example one dedicated to downloading games, if it can be verified that the downloads are virus-free, the user does not have to know if the game is legal or not. I certainly find this somewhat exaggerated.Īnyway, in any case it is a good habit to put the sources of content that is posted. The internet is a scary place.Īgree with this, it's risky for the forum to publish downloadable content with copyright, because the person in charge is the owner/admin of the forum who allows it, not the user who put the link.īut there the regulations of each country are valid in this regard, extrem use it in German forums according to their own experiences, which do not even allow images without these being checked before if they have copyright or not, if they are not their own images. I was more thinking of the risk of some sort of DMCA claim against the forum itself, and it ending up in some kind of bad standing, but I'm probably worrying over nothing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |